<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for North Wakefield Gyratory</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.iport.co.uk/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.iport.co.uk</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 21 Apr 2010 06:09:20 +0100</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>Comment on Viability of Park and ride by Darren Gilcrease</title>
		<link>http://www.iport.co.uk/2009/09/viability-of-park-and-ride/comment-page-1/#comment-134</link>
		<dc:creator>Darren Gilcrease</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Apr 2010 06:09:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.iport.co.uk/?p=212#comment-134</guid>
		<description>ohhh nice info</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>ohhh nice info</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Council withholds information by dijonyumm</title>
		<link>http://www.iport.co.uk/2009/09/council-withholds-information/comment-page-1/#comment-133</link>
		<dc:creator>dijonyumm</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 Apr 2010 01:30:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.iport.co.uk/?p=229#comment-133</guid>
		<description>I read about it some days ago in another blog and the main things that you mention here are very similar</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I read about it some days ago in another blog and the main things that you mention here are very similar</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Viability of Park and ride by stevena</title>
		<link>http://www.iport.co.uk/2009/09/viability-of-park-and-ride/comment-page-1/#comment-132</link>
		<dc:creator>stevena</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Mar 2010 22:40:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.iport.co.uk/?p=212#comment-132</guid>
		<description>affordable health insurance avbm cheap auto insurance :-]] auto insurance quotes :[ auto insurance wyxl auto insurance quotes 8-PPP</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>affordable health insurance avbm cheap auto insurance :-]] auto insurance quotes :[ auto insurance wyxl auto insurance quotes 8-PPP</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on One way system scrapped by Jane Becker</title>
		<link>http://www.iport.co.uk/2009/10/one-way-system-scrapped/comment-page-1/#comment-16</link>
		<dc:creator>Jane Becker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Oct 2009 20:36:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.iport.co.uk/?p=237#comment-16</guid>
		<description>I am very pleased that our objections have been listened to. May I add my thanks to those who put in time and effort to publicise the scheme. Let us hope they will start with a park and ride scheme and that the schools play ball about the congestion. It has been fine in St Johns this week! Interestingly, terrible on Ings Road heading towards Doncaster Road. Plenty there to exercise the Highways folk!
A special thanks to Jools and Jo for setting up the website and for keeping it open to allow  future developments to be posted.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am very pleased that our objections have been listened to. May I add my thanks to those who put in time and effort to publicise the scheme. Let us hope they will start with a park and ride scheme and that the schools play ball about the congestion. It has been fine in St Johns this week! Interestingly, terrible on Ings Road heading towards Doncaster Road. Plenty there to exercise the Highways folk!<br />
A special thanks to Jools and Jo for setting up the website and for keeping it open to allow  future developments to be posted.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Council withholds information by Nick Shields</title>
		<link>http://www.iport.co.uk/2009/09/council-withholds-information/comment-page-1/#comment-11</link>
		<dc:creator>Nick Shields</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 Sep 2009 16:39:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.iport.co.uk/?p=229#comment-11</guid>
		<description>Extraordinary!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Extraordinary!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on FOI request for traffic surveys by Mark</title>
		<link>http://www.iport.co.uk/2009/07/foi-request-for-traffic-surveys/comment-page-1/#comment-9</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Jul 2009 09:46:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.iport.co.uk/?p=147#comment-9</guid>
		<description>As a result of the Link Road becoming one-way, the volume of heavy traffic (buses &amp; lorries) going past the Londis shop will increase substantially, which will exacerbate an already dangerous situation around the shop with cars parking and pulling out into the road. I think this is a real safety concern, especially as the road is not suited to heavy traffic but it will also cut the green off from the community and again the effect will be detrimental. (It is worth noting that when the last road changes were made at the junction of Snow Hill and Bradford Rd - next to the school playground, an agreement was made that no buses would use this route. Gradually this agreement has been eroded and is now totally ignored.)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As a result of the Link Road becoming one-way, the volume of heavy traffic (buses &amp; lorries) going past the Londis shop will increase substantially, which will exacerbate an already dangerous situation around the shop with cars parking and pulling out into the road. I think this is a real safety concern, especially as the road is not suited to heavy traffic but it will also cut the green off from the community and again the effect will be detrimental. (It is worth noting that when the last road changes were made at the junction of Snow Hill and Bradford Rd &#8211; next to the school playground, an agreement was made that no buses would use this route. Gradually this agreement has been eroded and is now totally ignored.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on FOI request for traffic surveys by Mark</title>
		<link>http://www.iport.co.uk/2009/07/foi-request-for-traffic-surveys/comment-page-1/#comment-8</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Jul 2009 09:45:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.iport.co.uk/?p=147#comment-8</guid>
		<description>The road past the Londis shop will be blocked to traffic coming down Bradford Rd into town as a result of that road becoming one-way, which will drive traffic either down Melbourne Rd and side streets to reach the back of the shop or up the link road and round the top of the green.  With a one-way system round 2 sides of the green, the green will effectively become a roundabout which will ruin the character of the area and have a detrimental effect on the community.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The road past the Londis shop will be blocked to traffic coming down Bradford Rd into town as a result of that road becoming one-way, which will drive traffic either down Melbourne Rd and side streets to reach the back of the shop or up the link road and round the top of the green.  With a one-way system round 2 sides of the green, the green will effectively become a roundabout which will ruin the character of the area and have a detrimental effect on the community.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on FOI request for traffic surveys by Mark</title>
		<link>http://www.iport.co.uk/2009/07/foi-request-for-traffic-surveys/comment-page-1/#comment-7</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Jul 2009 09:45:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.iport.co.uk/?p=147#comment-7</guid>
		<description>Wentworth St/Bradford Rd will see a significant increase in the volume of buses and lorries, especially buses if there is to be a park and ride facility. This will result in heavy traffic being driven through the heart of the St John&#039;s conservation area and right next to the most heavily used part of the school playground. As a result, the character of the area, which is one of the few parts of Wakefield with any character remaining, will be ruined; the impact on the community will be detrimental; and children&#039;s health will suffer as a result of the worst polluting vehicles stopping and starting right next to the playground.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wentworth St/Bradford Rd will see a significant increase in the volume of buses and lorries, especially buses if there is to be a park and ride facility. This will result in heavy traffic being driven through the heart of the St John&#8217;s conservation area and right next to the most heavily used part of the school playground. As a result, the character of the area, which is one of the few parts of Wakefield with any character remaining, will be ruined; the impact on the community will be detrimental; and children&#8217;s health will suffer as a result of the worst polluting vehicles stopping and starting right next to the playground.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Council cabinet approves Gyratory in principal by David Perkin</title>
		<link>http://www.iport.co.uk/2009/06/council-cabinet-approves-gyratory-in-principal/comment-page-1/#comment-5</link>
		<dc:creator>David Perkin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Jul 2009 14:21:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.iport.co.uk/?p=71#comment-5</guid>
		<description>1.One only has to observe the traffic flows in the area outside of school term time to conclude that there is no substantive problem to justify the proposed gyratory.
2.The Council would be better advised to first address the problems created by the transport of children to and from the various schools in the area 
3.The suggested &quot;lay over parking from home to school transport&quot;  and an integrated Park and Ride might in themselves achieve  the majority of the objectives of the Council.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>1.One only has to observe the traffic flows in the area outside of school term time to conclude that there is no substantive problem to justify the proposed gyratory.<br />
2.The Council would be better advised to first address the problems created by the transport of children to and from the various schools in the area<br />
3.The suggested &#8220;lay over parking from home to school transport&#8221;  and an integrated Park and Ride might in themselves achieve  the majority of the objectives of the Council.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Council cabinet approves Gyratory in principal by Denise</title>
		<link>http://www.iport.co.uk/2009/06/council-cabinet-approves-gyratory-in-principal/comment-page-1/#comment-3</link>
		<dc:creator>Denise</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Jun 2009 18:59:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.iport.co.uk/?p=71#comment-3</guid>
		<description>Its a nightmare already trying to get into town from Newton Hill School between 8.30 and 9am due to the lollipop man outside QUEGS who is trigger hapy with the button. By increasing the volume of traffic along this route will just make things 10 times worse.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Its a nightmare already trying to get into town from Newton Hill School between 8.30 and 9am due to the lollipop man outside QUEGS who is trigger hapy with the button. By increasing the volume of traffic along this route will just make things 10 times worse.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
